TL;DR

Before you orderOffer from Amazon

Get everyday essentials delivered free with Prime

• Fast, free delivery on millions of items
• Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
• Member-only deals all year

Start your free Prime trial →Free trial for eligible customers · Cancel anytime

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.Hide

A Data for Progress survey comparing responses from 2026 with a 1995 survey found lower participation in several social activities, including hosting people at home and attending club meetings. The surveys used different methods, so the results suggest broad trends rather than precise estimates of change.

Americans reported lower participation in several in-person social activities in a 2026 survey than respondents did in a 1995 survey, according to an analysis by Data for Progress. The largest listed declines included hosting people at home and attending classes or seminars, though the comparison is suggestive rather than a precise measure because the surveys used different methods.

Data for Progress surveyed 1,098 U.S. adults about how often they had taken part in specific activities during the previous 12 months. It compared the responses with the DDB Needham Life Style survey from 1995, asking questions designed to replicate those in the older survey. The analysis reports changes in the share of respondents who did each activity at least once in a year.

Among the activities with lower reported participation, entertaining people at home fell 21 percentage points, from 88% in 1995 to 67% in 2026. Attendance at club meetings dropped 19 points, from 45% to 26%. The analysis also lists declines in attending a class or seminar (-22 points), attending a place of worship (-20), going on a picnic (-19), playing cards (-19), eating breakfast at a restaurant (-13), and doing volunteer work (-12).

Some activities moved in the opposite direction. The analysis reports a 90-point increase in internet use, alongside increases in playing home video games (+22 points), attending exercise classes (+14), going to pop or rock concerts (+13), and taking an airline trip for personal reasons (+5). These figures represent changes in the share reporting participation at least once in the prior year, not how frequently people took part.

Fewer Gatherings, Different Habits

The results add activity-level detail to broader research suggesting Americans spend less time socializing and report fewer close relationships. Instead of measuring social connection only through general questions about loneliness or time with others, the comparison tracks familiar settings and routines: home gatherings, clubs, worship, meals, and volunteering.

That distinction matters because occasional participation is not the same as the depth or quality of relationships. A person who attended a club once still counts in these figures, while the survey does not establish how many friends respondents have, how often they meet, or whether they feel lonely. The findings describe reported participation in selected activities; they do not establish why it changed or whether the changes caused greater isolation.

The reported increases also complicate any simple account of social life disappearing. Some activities became more common, including exercise classes and concerts, while internet use rose sharply. The comparison points to changes in where and how people spend time, but it cannot determine whether online engagement replaces in-person contact or adds to it.

Earlier Signs of Social Change

The report situates its comparison alongside other measures of social life. American Time Use Survey tracking has shown that Americans spend more time alone and less time with friends than they did two decades earlier. Separately, the American Perspectives Survey found that the share of Americans reporting five or more close friends fell from 63% in 1990 to 38% in 2021, a 25-percentage-point decline.

Public concern about loneliness also drew national attention in 2023, when the U.S. surgeon general issued an advisory describing loneliness in the country as an “epidemic.” The Data for Progress analysis draws on a different kind of evidence: it compares participation in particular activities with historical results from the DDB Needham Life Style surveys, which tracked such behaviors from 1975 to 1999 and were referenced in Robert Putnam’s 2000 book Bowling Alone.

The 1995 survey is the comparison point because, according to the analysis, it is the earliest year in that series with complete data for all the questions selected for comparison. The results therefore cover roughly three decades but do not provide a continuous annual record of each activity.

“The findings below should be read as suggestive of trends, not a precise estimate of change.”

— Data for Progress

Survey Methods Limit Precision

The comparison uses surveys with different sampling frames, modes, and weighting approaches. The 1995 DDB Needham survey used stratified quota sampling based on commercial mailing lists and contacted participants by mail. The 2026 Data for Progress survey used web-panel suppliers, quota fielding, and post-stratification weighting to seek national representativeness.

Those differences can affect who responds and how people answer. Data for Progress notes that survey mode may influence responses on topics such as religiosity and loneliness and that social-desirability bias may also matter. The report argues that the consistency and scale of declines across several measures are meaningful signals, but the methodology does not remove the possibility that some of the measured change reflects differences in survey design.

The analysis also measures whether someone took part at least once in the previous year. It does not show frequency, group size, personal circumstances, or reasons for changes. The available results cannot establish whether fewer gatherings reflect changing preferences, economic pressures, technology, population shifts, or other factors.

Further Data Could Clarify Trends

The report presents a comparison between two survey years, rather than a forecast or a schedule for another survey. No follow-up date or additional data release is specified in the information available here.

More comparable tracking over time could help distinguish lasting changes in social habits from differences created by survey methods. Repeated surveys using the same sampling approach and question wording could also clarify whether participation is continuing to fall, stabilizing, or shifting toward activities that are not captured by this list. Until then, the 1995-to-2026 figures are best treated as evidence of reported differences across selected activities, with methodological limits kept in view.

Source: Hacker News

Key Questions

What did the 2026 survey find?

Compared with the 1995 survey, respondents in 2026 were less likely to report taking part in several activities at least once in the previous year, including hosting people at home and attending club meetings. Some activities, such as exercise classes and concerts, showed increases.

How much did home entertaining decline?

The share who said they had entertained people at home at least once in the past year fell from 88% in 1995 to 67% in 2026, a decline of 21 percentage points.

Can the results prove Americans are more lonely?

No. The survey measures participation in selected activities, not loneliness or the quality of people’s relationships. Other research has tracked loneliness, time spent alone, and close friendships, but those are different measures.

Why does the report call the comparison suggestive?

The 1995 and 2026 surveys used different sampling, survey modes, and weighting methods. Those differences can affect responses, so the figures should not be read as precise estimates of change.

Source: Hacker News