TL;DR
Get everyday essentials delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Guardian Life paired Sam, 29, who intends to vote Green when eligible in the UK, with Roger, 80, a longtime supporter of political outliers who now backs Reform. Their dinner covered climate policy, immigration and political donations; both said they enjoyed the conversation and planned to stay in contact.
Sam, 29, and Roger, 80, met for dinner at the Bull & Last in north London to discuss their sharply different political views, in a Guardian Life edition of Dining Across the Divide. Sam, an American who cannot yet vote in UK elections and says she intends to vote Green when eligible, told Roger that her Trump-supporting family had given her practice talking with people on the far right.
The pair found common ground early in the meal, despite major differences over climate policy and immigration. Roger, a retired accountant who says he has voted for political “outliers” rather than Labour or the Conservatives and now supports Reform, argued that the UK should continue extracting oil and gas from the North Sea. He said he believes the shift to net zero and electrification is happening too quickly.
Sam said reducing carbon dioxide emissions should be the priority in responding to the climate crisis. She also argued that lowering beef production and eating more plant-based food could help. When Roger advocated greater domestic production and continued fossil fuel extraction, Sam said those positions conflicted: increased emissions, she argued, raise temperatures and reduce water availability for agriculture.
The conversation also turned to immigration, Islam and political donations. Roger described himself as a xenophobe and defended that position as a form of risk awareness. Sam said his remarks about Muslims recalled fear-based arguments she had encountered growing up in a predominantly white, Christian Republican area in Colorado. On political funding, Roger said he objected to Nigel Farage not declaring a £5m donation, while Sam criticized the influence large donations can have on elections.
Guardian Life · Dining Across the Divide
Dining Across
The Divide
“My family are all Trumpian, so I’ve had a lot of practice talking to people who are far right.” At dinner in north London, Sam and Roger put sharply different views on climate, immigration and politics into conversation.
The people at the table
Two perspectives, one meal
They met at the Bull & Last to talk through political differences. Their accounts reflect their own experiences and views.
Green when eligible
An American compliance officer living in central London. She cannot currently vote in UK elections and says she intends to vote Green when eligible. Growing up in Colorado, she often heard far-right views from her Trump-supporting family.
Reform supporter
A retired accountant from north-west London. He says he has voted for political outliers rather than Labour or the Conservatives, and now supports Reform. He described himself as a xenophobe.
Where views diverged
Climate, borders & political power
The evening made room for disagreement without reporting that either person changed their position.
Net zero and fossil fuels
Roger argued that the UK should keep extracting North Sea oil and gas, and said the move to net zero and electrification is too fast. Sam said cutting CO₂ emissions should be the priority in addressing climate change.
Production choices
Sam suggested reducing beef production and eating more plant-based food. She argued that higher emissions contribute to warming and can reduce water available for agriculture.
Fear and familiarity
Roger framed xenophobia as risk awareness. Sam said his remarks about Muslims echoed fear-based arguments she had heard growing up in a predominantly white, Christian Republican area in Colorado.
Money and elections
Roger objected to Nigel Farage not declaring a £5m donation. Sam criticized the influence large donations can have on elections.
In their own words
Sharp differences, direct exchange
Selected remarks from the reported dinner.
“My family are all Trumpian, so I’ve had a lot of practice talking to people who are far right.”
Sam“I don’t like net zero – I think it’s all happening too quickly.”
Roger“I am a xenophobe and proud of it.”
RogerHow the evening unfolded
Disagreement to continued contact
A structured conversation brought opposing views into direct contact; agreement on the major issues was not reported.
How to read this account
One dinner has limits
This is a personal exchange, not a survey of Green or Reform supporters. The published account records participants’ descriptions and does not establish how common their views are.
- Claims: Their broader claims about terrorism, immigration, climate effects and donations are not independently verified in the account.
- Outcomes: No further meeting or follow-up is described, and it is unclear whether the discussion changed either person’s views.
- Voting: The account does not specify when Sam may become eligible to vote in the UK.
- What is known: Both said the evening was amicable; Sam and Roger planned to keep in contact.
Quick answers
Key questions
What the report says about the participants and their conversation.
Who took part?
Sam, 29, an American compliance officer, and Roger, 80, a retired accountant, met at the Bull & Last in north London.
What did they disagree about?
They discussed the pace of net zero, North Sea oil and gas, immigration, Islam and political donations.
What are Sam’s voting plans?
She said she cannot yet vote in UK elections and intends to vote Green when eligible.
Did they reach agreement?
They did not report resolving their major disagreements. Both called the dinner amicable and planned to keep in contact.
A Dinner on Climate and Immigration
The exchange shows how a structured conversation can bring people with stark political disagreements into direct contact without requiring them to resolve those differences. Sam and Roger discussed contested subjects including fossil fuels, migration and Islam, but both described the evening as amicable and identified areas of agreement.
The account is a personal conversation, not polling or evidence about how all Green or Reform supporters think. Its relevance lies in the specific contrast between the participants’ views and in their willingness to continue talking: Roger called Sam intelligent and charming, and Sam said they had arranged to keep in contact.
Popular right now
Bose QuietComfort Wireless Noise Cancelling Headphones, Sandstone
Shark PowerPro Reveal Plus Cordless Vacuum Cleaner, Charcoal, IZ376H
De'Longhi 15-Bar Pump Espresso Machine with Milk Frother & Temperature Control
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Who Sam and Roger Are
Sam is a 29-year-old compliance officer living in central London. She is American and therefore cannot currently vote in UK elections, according to her profile; she says she intends to vote Green when she becomes eligible. She grew up in Colorado and said she had not met a Muslim person until moving to Glasgow, where her experience challenged the rhetoric she had heard growing up.
Roger is an 80-year-old retired accountant from north-west London. He said he had never voted Labour or Conservative, instead supporting smaller or less established parties and now Reform. He also recalled working as an internal auditor in Angola in 1978 during the civil war, where he said he bribed soldiers with cigarettes to reach the frontline because he wanted to hear the guns. The dinner took place at the Bull & Last; Sam ordered wild mushroom risotto and Roger had fish and chips after dressed crab.
“My family are all Trumpian, so I’ve had a lot of practice talking to people who are far right.”
— Sam
Limits of One Dinner
The published account records the participants’ own descriptions and views; it does not independently verify their broader claims about terrorism, immigration, climate effects or political donations. The dinner is a single exchange and cannot establish how common either participant’s opinions are among voters. The account also does not specify when Sam may become eligible to vote in the UK.
Although both said they found the conversation amicable and planned to stay in contact, no further meeting or follow-up is described. It is unclear whether their discussion changed either person’s views.
Their Conversation Continues
Sam and Roger said they had arranged to keep in contact after the meal, but no date or plan for another meeting was given. The published account does not report any subsequent exchange or change in their political positions.
Guardian Life invites readers interested in meeting someone with opposing views to find out how to take part in Dining Across the Divide. No further details about upcoming participants or a next instalment are included in the account.
Source: Guardian Life
Key Questions
Who took part in the dinner?
Sam, 29, and Roger, 80, met at the Bull & Last in north London. Sam is an American compliance officer; Roger is a retired accountant.
What political views did they disagree about?
They disagreed over the pace of net zero policies, continued North Sea oil and gas extraction, immigration and Roger’s remarks about Muslims. They also discussed political donations and Nigel Farage.
What did Sam say about her voting plans?
Sam said she cannot yet vote in UK elections because she is American, but intends to vote Green when she is eligible.
Did they reach agreement?
They did not report resolving their major disagreements. Both described the dinner as amicable, and Sam and Roger said they had arranged to keep in contact.
Source: Guardian Life
